Around The Web
Linc Energy fined $4.5m for pollution amounting to 'ecological vandalism'
Prosecution seen as key test of Queensland’s ability to hold mining companies to account
The failed Queensland energy company Linc Energy has been slapped with one of the state’s largest environmental fines and ordered to pay $4.5m for contaminating farmland in the state’s western downs.
Judge Michael Shanahan said the company’s actions amounted to “ecological vandalism”.
But questions remain about whether the company’s liquidators, who pleaded not guilty but chose not to mount a defence in the Brisbane district court, can be forced to pay the fine and an estimated $72m cleanup bill.
2°C or not 2°C? The unanswered questions from ExxonMobil and Chevron climate risk reports
Amendments to the EPBC Act list of threatened species
Frydenberg says NEG is “best chance” for coal generation
US, Australia fight push to bar fossil fuel interests from climate talks
The stunning numbers behind success of Tesla big battery
CP Daily: Thursday May 10, 2018
Origins of amphibian-killing fungus uncovered
NA Markets: WCI prices stall near floor price as auction looms large
Smartphone sequestration: App targets small forest owners for California offsets
Red tide: Electric blue waves wash California shore
Here's how a complex low-pressure system sent temperatures plummeting
Trump White House axes Nasa research into greenhouse gas cuts
Pollutionwatch: do face masks really prevent the ill effects of pollution?
Scientists tested nine different masks bought from Beijing, with variable results
We are all familiar with images of Beijing citizens wearing masks, but do they work? Scientists from Edinburgh’s Institute for Occupational Medicine tested nine different masks bought from Beijing shops. Generally, the filter in each mask worked well, the best stopped over 99% of the particle pollution and the worst stopped 70% to 80%. Next, volunteers wore the masks in a test chamber filled with diesel exhaust. Pollution inside the mask was measured as they walked, nodded and talked. One mask stopped 90% of the particle pollution while others offered almost no protection. The tightness of fit was crucial. Facial hair prevents a good seal and the fit also depends on the shape of the user’s face. If it fits well then breathing through a mask is not easy. Wearing a mask could therefore pose problems for people who already have breathing or heart difficulties. So, face masks are not the answer to our problems. Walking alongside quiet instead of busy roads can help, and generally you will experience less pollution if you walk or cycle rather than sit in a car, but the best route to clean air is not masks. We need reduce the pollution in our cities.
Continue reading...New technology could slash carbon emissions from aluminium production
Development could transform how one of the world’s most common materials is made
Technology has been unveiled that could drastically cut greenhouse gas emissions from aluminium production, in a development that could transform the way one of the world’s most common materials is made.
Aluminium is used to make cars, construction materials, industrial machinery, electrical products, drinks cans, foil packaging and much more. But its production relies on processes that have changed little since the 1880s when the first smelting processes were pioneered.
Continue reading...